Leadership in, or Rather on, a Cup

Sometimes you never know from whence wisdom will leap: I was reading the back of my cup of iced tea from Chipotle Grill and found this quote from Wes Jackson, founder of The Land Institute: “If your life’s work can be accomplished in your lifetime, you’re thinking too small.”

I recently spent a great four days in Atlanta working with my co-authors on a forthcoming book on meta-leadership.  We wrestled with many issues but one that I think we need to go back to is, “What is the purpose of leadership?” In short, why care? Why go to all of the work to develop the capability? Why buy our book? I got caught up in thinking back to Burns’ definition that leadership is the achievement of desired objectives — nice, but rather dry and academic (and a great over-simplification of Burns’ work). One my co-authors, Lenny Marcus, likes the simple “you’re a leader if you have followers” but that doesn’t speak to leadership.

But Wes’s words really hit me between the eyes — reminding me to think deeply about both about my own life’s work as well as the life’s work of the many (we hope) people who buy the book. It is too easy to assume that everyone knows why they want to be — or should be — a leader. Leadership is aspirational and a worthy calling but one can’t take its value for granted or wear it like a merit badge for basket weaving.

We started into a discussion on legacy though there was push-back that legacy is too airy-fairy. I think that’s wrong. I think that what may truly differentiate true leadership from other activities that seem to fall under that name is impact: Will the impact last after you are gone? Will you have had a deep enough impact on other people that they will change what they do and why they do it significantly enough that you can claim to have led that change? Will others take forward what you have done, shape it, and pass it on?

I think that this will be an ongoing discussion. What do you think?

Leadership and the Emotional Basement

Here’s a post that I published awhile back on the At Work Network. It is related to the work on meta-leadership in which I’m engaged at the National Preparedness Leadership Initiative at Harvard:

How much of your response in a crisis remains under your conscious control? If you are called upon to lead in a crisis, it is a question you should be prepared to answer. In physiological terms, your initial response is largely hard-wired. A sudden threat or crisis—be it a mugger, a fire, or to a lesser extent the announcement of a layoff—triggers the amygdala and the base of the brain, those parts of the brain activated by fear, distress, and anger. From here you will get a “fight, flight, or freeze” response. The brain is in survival mode and will suppress higher reasoning in order clear all channels for rapid action to mitigate the perceived threat.

This is the oldest part of the human brain (also known as the hindbrain); one we share with primates. This hard-wired capacity explains why you jump in fright during a horror movie even though, on a conscious level, you know that you are in no danger when the zombie with the knife leaps from the shadows. Your hindbrain takes over for a moment and invokes an involuntary response.

While the hindbrain can be an excellent asset in a threatening situation, it can inhibit effective leadership. In order to lead others, you need to be able to think at a higher level and make strategic decisions rather than panicked reactions. In fact, according to leadership authorities Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee, prolonged arousal of the Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) can deplete energy and hinder the ability to function and innovate.

The emotional basement

Dr. Barry Dorn of the Harvard School of Public Health calls this amygdala-controlled state “the emotional basement.” One characteristic of an effective leader in crisis, or “meta-leader” as Dorn and his colleagues have termed it, is to comprehend that you are in the basement and consciously climb out of it. How? One of the reasons that first responders have practiced procedures and protocols is that they trigger constructive activity and allow for reasoned decision making. It’s also why your organization practices fire drills. Think about what relevant, routine activity you can undertake to instill that calm in yourself. A simple one is to take a deep breath. Controlling your breathing is a great first step to restoring your control over your physical responses and allowing those parts of your brain that control reasoning to reassert dominance.

The second challenge, according to Dorn, is for you to understand that everyone around you is also likely to be in the “emotional basement.” You must help them climb up as well if you expect your followers to understand and follow direction. Again, simply asking everyone to take a deep breath is a good first step. Projecting calm and control will help engender it in others. Give clear, simple, concrete direction in a firm, controlled manner to project that you are in charge (e.g., “We’ll proceed down the West staircase and across the parking lot. Leave everything here and walk calmly out of the building.”)

Responding to complexity

In a more complex situation, give people specific tasks. If, for example, you are an IT or data security leader and your organization was the victim of a data breach, you would have someone check the activity logs, someone else check the firewalls, yet someone else examine recent server patches, etc. These would be tasks with which the people have familiarity; the routine will help them climb out of the basement. If you don’t have a task, make one up. To return to the movies, you’ve undoubtedly seen a scene in which an expectant father is panicked over the impending birth. The doctor (or other authority figure) will send him off to boil water. No one actually needs the boiling water but the simple, seemingly useful task helps the father focus and regain composure. This is usually played for comic effect on film but the underlying principle is actually sound advice.

These physiological responses explain why even the most laid back, non-hierarchical groups will long for the certainty of a command-and-control structure in a crisis situation. If leadership comprises authority, power, and influence, this is the time to leverage your authority and you will quickly discover how much you actually have. One of the reasons that leaders often rise from unexpected places during crisis is that true authority doesn’t always rest with the person formally in charge. People will follow the person they think can best lead to the far side of trouble.

“It takes great self-awareness, stamina, and discipline to control one’s gut-level responses in a stressful situation and intentionally elevate your mental activity out of ‘the basement’ and to bring others along with you,” says Dorn. “However, as a leader, it is the most important first step you can take.”