How Clean is Your Transportation?

On May 17 I will have the honor to return to New York to moderate a discussion on clean transportation for the Columbia Business School Alumni Club of New York. Last year’s conversation was robust and wide-ranging and this year’s should be just as engaging. Appearing on the panel are:

- Rich Kassel of the National Resources Defense Council
- Stephen Marlin of General Motors
- Bruce Schaller of the New York City Department of Transportation

We’ll be taking on everything from the continuing challenges for electric vehicles to the sorry state of public investment in mass transit. Of course this is a business audience, we’ll also be talking about where the smart money is placing its bets now.

If you are going to be in New York on the evening of May 17, please join us. If not (or in any case), what questions would you like me to pose to these panelists? I’ll post on the discussion so you’ll get your answers.

Here is more information on the event: MGFG Transportation 5 17 12_(Final PDF)

Urban Biking: Boston’s Freedman on Improving Safety and Access

As biking season returns to Boston (and it never really left with our mild winter), I thought it a good time to post my interview with Nicole Freedman, director of bicycle programs for the City of Boston, otherwise knows as the mayor’s “bike czar.” Freedman has overseen the launch of the Hubway bike sharing program — the first in the U.S., the expansion of bike lanes, and a number of other initiatives aimed to encourage more bicycle use while also making it easier for bikes to coexist with cars. Boston has long been considered a tough place to bike — Freedman’s mission is to change that in a big way and make Boston a more sustainable city.

Nicole Freedman is a former bicycle racer with two titles as U.S. national champion and a member of the 2000 Olympic team, she brings an intense love of of bicycling and a competitor’s zeal to the position. Her racing career gave her experience riding in cities around the country and internationally. She also has an urban planning degree and experience as a bicycle  planner in California.

Freedman said that the inspiration to make the city more bicycle friendly came from Mayor Menino. Boston had been ranked as one of the most unfriendly cities for bicycles and he “was savvy enough to know that if Boston was to be appealing to smart, young professionals it had to be seen as socially progressive.” This was the inspiration for his sustainability initiatives and the bicycle program is part of that effort.

This top-down approach was critical according to Freedman. She noted that Boston is governed by a “strong mayor system” and thus Menino’s support and enthusiasm were critical. She said that this has been true for each of the top bicycling cities she has visited.

“Mayor Menino opened doors,” she said. “My job was to walk through them and make things happen.”

One of her significant early challenges was working with City engineers as they were not familiar with how to make a city bicycle friendly. Their training was automobile-centric. She brought in an outside firm, Tool Design Group, that had cutting edge expertise in this area. This gave Freedman a critical interface: she had engineers with whom she could communicate — they understood what she wanted to do — and they in turn could communicate with the City’s engineers in “engineer speak.”

“Once the City engineers knew that this was going to be a long-term effort and not just a passing fad, they took it seriously. Once they understood how they could contribute and how bicycles could be integrated into their projects, they became enthusiastic.”

She knew that she alone would not have all of the answers. In October 2007 she convened a three-day Boston Bikes Summit which brought together the public and a wide range of experts to brainstorm ideas for cycling in Boston. From these diverse perspectives came a plan to achieve the vision of a bike-friendly Boston.

The results are beginning to show. The share of trips in Boston made by bicycle doubled between 2007 and 2009. “That sounds impressive but we have only gone from 1% to 2%.” Her goal is to get to European levels of “5%, 7%, 10% mode share of journeys.” Five percent or greater is the level at which a city is a “world class bicycle city, she said. She looks to New York and Portland, Oregon as model U.S. cities to watch.

The most recent visible evidence of Boston’s commitment to bicycles is the Hubway bike share program that launched in summer 2011. While it is too early to have much data, Freedman said that usage had met expectations. The vision is that the Hubway bicycles will be used about equally by residents and visitors.

Freedman uses a fairly standard arsenal of tools to build community support and bicycle  usage: events, education, and enticements. “Building support is not complicated,” she said. “It is time intensive and labor intensive, but it is not complicated.”

For example, Boston hosts a city-wide ride called Hub on Wheels that is both an event and an educational opportunity. The ride is designed to get show more bicyclists the many opportunities there are to ride in the city and for people in the city to get to used  to seeing more bicycles on the streets. She noted that Hub on Wheels is also designed to help educate riders on how to ride safely in an urban environment and for non-riders to see that large groups can ride in an orderly, courteous way.

Freedman said that the more people see bicycles as part of the normal flow of traffic, the more likely they are to try cycling themselves and respect cyclists’ use of the road. Pedestrians, drivers, and cyclists must all respect each other, particularly given Boston’s narrow, congested streets. “It’s a combination of demonstration and inspiration,” she said.

Enticements include demarcated bike lanes, bike racks, and other amenities that make it easier to use a bicycle as a regular mode of transportation.

Most recently, the City has begun to investigate a program of personalized marketing. Inspired by an initiative in Australia, the City wants to move beyond general information and timetables to providing precise answers to specific travel inquiries. Dubbed Travel Smart, it enables citizens to get exact mass transit and biking route information between points in Boston.

The City also works with the business community. It provides a list of suggestions for how to be a bike-friendly enterprise and Freedman says that participation is increasing. The City is also using its regulatory tools to increase the requirements for new construction in terms of bicycle amenities.

Asked about collaboration with neighboring communities such as Brookline and Cambridge, Freedman said that it is important but a lower priority than “getting Boston where it needs to be.” She said that Boston will align bike lanes when requested. They also used the City’s heftier bargaining power to set favorable terms with the bike share program vendor that will be extended to Cambridge and Somerville in 2012.

Freedman said that City of Boston is much better as using inducements, “carrots,” than penalties and other “sticks.” There isn’t yet the political support to use authority to be more assertive.  She noted, however, that “until you make drivers pay for all of the externalities” associated with the automobile “there is only so far you can go before you hit a wall.”

Asked what she would do if she could wave a magic wand, Freedman went right to the “sticks”: $6.00 a gallon gas, no on-street parking, and a downtown congestion charge. She concluded, “Give me those and I wouldn’t have to build a single mile of bike lane because the streets would be full of cyclists.”

Interview with Julie Bargmann, Brownfields Diva

I had the good fortune to interview Julie Bargmann a couple of months back. I spoke with her about the leadership challenges she faces in brownfield reclamation projects. Bargmann is a landscape architect extraordinaire and nationally known brownfield reclamation expert. Brownfields are “real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.” In other words, those previously developed plots loaded with lots of nasty stuff like old industrial sites.

Bargmann is an associate professor at the University of Virginia School of Architecture where her research through Project D.I.R.T., Design Investigations Reclaiming Terrain, aims to “excavate the creative potential of degraded landscapes.” She is also a principal at D.I.R.T. (Dump it Right Here) Studio in New York. In both of these pursuits, Bargmann’s work is interdisciplinary and driven by an “obsession with urban regeneration”.

Bargmann has worked on such high profile projects as the green roof on the Ford River Rouge plant, working with William McDonough & Associates among others, and New York’s High Line Park, working with Michael VanValkenberg & Associates among others.

Her hero is Robert Smithson, the American artist who is one of the founders of the earthworks or land art movement. She described him as thinking with “a greater clock” – having deeper and more expansive concepts of time that were revealed through his sculpture. His art and essays have inspired her to think differently about land and landscapes. She said that she finds beauty in industrial landscapes and sees industrial uses of land simply as one point on a continuum of usage that stretch through time. “It’s not as if we are taking a landscape from what it is back to what it once was; I want to help the landscape become what it is meant to be next.”

Bargmann described the challenges of her work as beginning with the general lack of familiarity with brownfields issues. “You have to understand the minds you are dealing with,” she said. “My job is not to make the issues less complex, but to make the outcomes seem more attainable.” Bargmann said that this is her greatest leadership challenge. She has to be facile with economic as well as design issues.

On the Rouge River project, Ford executives were initially not interested in a green roof. However she and the team were able to convince the head of Ford’s environment group of the value of the project. He, in turn, became a champion who swayed the balance of the Ford executives.

“Every designer needs a champion on the client side,” she said. “You have to plant the seed, be catalytic, and get them thinking beyond business as usual. It means being both pragmatic and poetic.”

She worked on the Vintondale Reclamation Park project in Pennsylvania. In this case, a historian was the champion for the project: he had the vision that the site of a former coal mine could be reclaimed as park land. The historian saw the park, which would also include art installations, as continuation of the work of the land. “He saw this as the next logical step for the land,” she said. Bargmann worked as part of pro-bono team for five years and describes this as a “seminal project” as it brought severely damaged land back as a productive, vital landscape. It was awarded the Phoenix Award, “the brownfields equivalent of Hollywood’s Oscars.”

Bargmann described the Vintondale project as a typical example of leading from the bottom up. This is where she often sees projects taking shape and so now concentrates her work on pilot and demonstration projects. She noted that major projects are difficult to find given the current economic climate. She has purposefully kept her firm small so that she can pick-and-choose those projects that are most interesting.

Not every project comes to fruition. The architect on a large project for a university that was expanding into a brownfield site brought Bargmann onto the project team. The original plan called for excavating tons of potentially contaminated soil and trucking it across several states for disposal. Bargmann and her team developed a plan for a “soil farm” process through which the “dirty” soil could have been reclaimed on site. “It made an enormous amount of sense but the team from the university just couldn’t get their arms around the idea,” she said.

Another leadership challenge for Bargmann is navigating the political aspects of a project. She noted that major projects typically involve a “dysfunctional network” of agencies, developers, designers, and other players. She said that she often had to play “match maker” between agencies that don’t often speak with each other, yet that must come together for a successful brownfield redevelopment. She counseled that knowing the players and their interests. Then you can “make room for the landscape’s best interests,” she said.

Bargmann said that it is important to “level the ground” and find a common desired outcome. She works to do this by focusing on what is “best for the landscape.” This gets the discussion out of the functional silos and up to a more strategic level. “I try to be the voice of the landscape,” she said.

No matter how skillful one is, however, permitting is still an enormous logistical challenge, she said. “No matter how many agencies give you the green light, there is always one more out there that can stop you in your tracks,” she said. To mitigate this she tries to work with architects (who are usually the design lead on a project) who are politically astute and who know how to navigate in the city where the project is situated. “Someone on the team has to know the bureaucracy,” she said.

Looking to the future Bargmann said that she is intrigued by smaller industrial cities such as Trenton and Baltimore where the challenges are great but resources scarce. She is particularly energized about the possibilities in Detroit, a city that is trying to “shrink in a purposeful way.” She sees the potential to create “an urban wilderness” out of abandoned industrial and commercial sites, a prospect she sees as an enormous, exciting challenge.

Bargmann’s work is instructive and an inspiration to see the discards of our past in a new light.

The Nation’s First Green Restaurant District?

It started as a assignment in the Envisioning Sustainable Cities class I took at Lesley University this fall: craft a proposal for a sustainability project for my home city. As a foodie and a neighborhood booster, I had the idea for a green restaurant district in Washington Square. After all, we are home to the Boston area’s first green restaurant — The Fireplace — and many other eateries from take-out to fine dining.

In doing the research for the proposal, I spoke with a number of local people and the idea took on a life of its own. It has been embraced by a number of local organizations as well as the Green Restaurant Association (GRA) which has agreed to certify Washington Square as the nation’s first green restaurant district if 25% of its restaurants meet the GRA’s certification standards. The Green Restaurant District project will be a feature of Brookline’s Climate Week in January 2012.

Why pursue a Green Restaurant District?

-          Restaurants are the dominant business in Wasington Square (20 of 62 storefront businesses are restaurants).

-          Restaurants have a greater impact on the environment than other businesses: on average, they use 2.5x the energy of other businesses, generate approximately 50,000 lbs of waste (95% of which could be recycled or composted), and use up to 300,000 gals of water;

-          The Square already has Boston’s first certified green restaurant here: The Fireplace. Owner Jim Solomon is enthusiastic and says that he saves significantly on his operating costs as a result of adopting environmentally friendly practices;

-          The Green Restaurant Association (GRA) gathered more than 2,000 signatures in Brookline from people who said that they wanted Brookline restaurants to “go green.”

Thus it seems logical: if  Washington Square restaurants  “go green,” they benefit from lower costs while the town benefits from a smaller environmental footprint. And, with the publicity likely to result from becoming the first green restaurant district in the country, more diners will be attracted to the Square giving business a boost. It’s a win, win, win!

Another personal benefit of the project is that it is a chance to move beyond the academic exploration of leadership to the front lines. While the initial enthusiasm from the neighborhood is great, it will take a lot of meeting, educating, and cajoling to make the green restaurant district a reality. And did I mention that I am looking forward to getting to know the restauranteurs better?

I’ll keep you posted. If you are interested in helping, please be in touch.

More Science May Not Be The Climate Change Answer

The battle between those scientists who believe in climate change and those who deny it continues to rage. Al Gore recently hosted an around-the-clock web broadcast entitled “24 Hours of Climate Reality.” A “map of climate change denial” was recently published in the New York Times detailing ideological and economics links in “the denial machine.” Deniers are unconvinced and see a vast liberal conspiracy built on shoddy science.

I am a climate change believer. I see it as one of the Pillar Trends that has the power to reshape our world and the way we live. However, I must ask: is the war for truth one that can be won?

In my latest paper, I explore the epistemology of climate change science. My conclusion is that more physical science is likely not the answer.  One must turn to the social sciences to better understand how we learn and come to hold the beliefs that we consider to be the “truth.”

I invite you to download the PDF: ClimateChangeSciencecc and leave your comments here.